The Stiletto program gets underway for an autonomous boat launch and recovery demonstration in Norfolk, Virginia.

What’s behind a surge in funding recently for startups in Massachusetts and Rhode Island that want to design and build ships?

Two words: uncrewed vessels.

With maritime drones seeing action in the Middle East and the Ukraine-Russia conflict, entrepreneurs and investors in the U.S. bet that the Pentagon is becoming more interested in the technology – and that there could be an opportunity for new suppliers.

Last month, a Lexington, Massachusetts, startup, Blue Water Autonomy, raised $50 million to build a 150-foot autonomous warship.

Last September, HavocAI, with headquarters in Providence, Rhode Island, raised $11 million to build a 100-foot vessel, with a targeted completion date of late 2025.

Boston-based Sea Machines has raised $58 million and is pitching two autonomous ships to military customers.

This year’s Big Beautiful Bill, signed by President Trump in July, allocated several billion dollars[1] toward unmanned systems across all branches of the military.

Becoming ‘the Waymo for the Open Ocean’

“Our big vision is we want to be the Waymo for the open ocean,” says Rylan Hamilton, CEO of Blue Water Autonomy. “The Navy is the most obvious customer, because they have a willingness to pay.”

One of Blue Water’s big backers is Google Ventures, the investment arm of the Silicon Valley tech giant. Hamilton previously worked for Amazon Robotics, the division of the e-commerce company that makes warehouse robots. He also spent four years serving as a surface warfare officer in the Navy.

Another co-founder, Austin Gray, served as a Naval intelligence officer and spent time working in a drone factory in Ukraine. He said in a recent interview[2] with the website Infinite Frontiers that he is “obsessed with applying everything happening in Ukraine to the Navy’s force architecture.”

Hamilton said the company “is basically creating a pickup truck for the Navy, where we can carry different payloads in the back, in 20- and 40-foot containers.” That could be equipment needed in a war zone or surveillance gear.

The Navy has said it is also interested in launching missiles from unmanned craft.

Blue Water isn’t just trying to reduce the number of crew members needed on a Navy ship; it’s trying to eliminate the crew entirely.

“From the keel up, [the ship is designed to have] zero people,” Hamilton said. “The minute you put one sailor on board, your cost goes up by three times, because you need to build berthing, you need to build a galley, you need to put a gym on there ... You’re basically putting a hotel on top of a ship.”

Hamilton adds that the lower cost of losing an uncrewed ship — in both dollars and lives — makes them appealing to the Navy.

The company has not yet chosen a site for building its vessels, Hamilton said, but Blue Water is already testing a large-scale prototype ship, packed with still-in-development technology, in Massachusetts waters.

The company recently hired several key team members who worked on a Pentagon research project[3] to design an uncrewed ship that could stay out at sea for up to a year.

Relying on Partners to Build

Sea Machines, based in Boston, got started a decade ago. But unlike Blue Water, it doesn’t plan to build its own ships.

“We’re working with builders that have that expertise,” Michael Johnson, founder and president of the company, said.

That includes one builder in Eastern Europe and one based in the Netherlands with an affiliate in Florida. Last year, Sea Machines unveiled two designs for small autonomous vessels, 22 feet and 26 feet in length.

Sea Machines has been supplying hardware and software to other shipbuilders that enable them to create autonomous or remotely-piloted vessels. The company has 42 employees and raised $58 million so far.

Johnson originally started the company in Texas, but moved to Massachusetts, “because I knew that I needed talent from the robotics space. I needed software talent.”

In contrast, he said, much of the shipbuilding talent and smaller shipyards are on the Gulf Coast and the Pacific Northwest.

HavocAI, the Rhode Island company, announced a partnership[4] in May to put its technology into ship hulls built in Honolulu by a company called PacMar. Earlier this month, the company demonstrated[5] that its small craft could help protect a ship convoy in an Army-sponsored competition held near Pearl Harbor on the island of Oahu in Hawaii.

Several of the startups headquartered in New England are already building ships outside of the region.

Gray Chynoweth, an angel investor in defense-related startups and a Navy reservist, said that it’s still “up for grabs” where the bulk of manufacturing will be done for this new kind of ship.

“I do think that there’s some cost structures that are going to be attractive about manufacturing elsewhere in the country, but I also think that there’s an opportunity for New England to figure out how to support those types of jobs here” — especially if they involve highly-automated assembly lines, Chynoweth said. “If labor [costs] aren’t a huge component of it, then it could be very cost-competitive to do it in New England.”

New Funding Could Flow

The defense sector could also be a bright spot for attracting federal research dollars – not to mention defense spending – in a region that has seen funding for many other kinds of scientific research decrease in 2025, Chynoweth said.

He noted that, in addition to companies building surface vessels, other startups such as Anduril Industries, Jaia Robotics and VATN Systems have teams in New England focusing on autonomous craft that would maneuver underneath it.

“I think a lot more autonomous companies could come out of Boston, given its deep roots in robotics,” Chynoweth said.

© 2025 Advance Local Media LLC.

Visit masslive.com[6].

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.[7]

© Copyright 2025 MassLive.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more

A new National Geographic docuseries called "Top Guns: The Next Generation," follows a handful of Navy and Marine Corps officers as they go through advanced strike fighter training — the last, hardest and most unforgiving phase of fighter pilot qualification

Read more

Gay pride flag flies during Pride Observance Month

A San Diego Navy doctor has been removed from her leadership role and is now under investigation after her social media profile caught the attention of a right-wing activist and the U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

U.S. Navy Cmdr. Janelle Marra, who has served on active duty in the Navy for 17 years, was the medical services director of Expeditionary Medical Facility 150 Bravo, a Navy unit in San Diego trained to provide medical care to support military operations.

Her LinkedIn profile was flagged in a post by a right-wing account[1] on X – Libs of TikTok – on Sept. 4, calling out Marra for including her pronouns on the page and listing a job title of “Deputy Medical Director for Transgender Healthcare.”

The post tagged Hegseth and asked him to “look into” it. By that evening, Hegseth re-shared the post[2] with the message: “Pronouns UPDATED: She/Her/Fired.”

While Marra has not officially been fired and is still working as a physician at Navy Medical Center San Diego clinics, she has been “administratively removed from her leadership position for a loss of confidence in her ability to lead” and is “under investigation for violating social media policy,” according to a U.S. Navy official.

The Department of Defense, which President Trump has asked Congress to rename the Department of War, said it stands by Hegseth’s post on X that commented on Marra’s pronouns and indicated that she would be terminated.

“The War Department is not in the business of radical gender theory. We are in the business of warfighting,” Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson said in a statement. “Secretary Hegseth’s post on X reaffirms this.”

For Marra’s family, the experience has been shocking.

“I never thought that somebody so high in government would be willing to target individual people,” said Marra’s wife, Cassandra. “They’re willing to put somebody in the military on that front page and be like, ‘Get her.’”

Marra could not be reached for comment while she’s under investigation.

Active-duty service members’ social media accounts have been under closer scrutiny this month. Multiple members are reportedly under investigation or have been suspended[3] for posts on social media critical of conservative activist Charlie Kirk following his recent assassination. Many of the posts were publicly flagged by accounts such as Libs of TikTok.

Nik Ursher, a communications associate professor at the University of San Diego who focuses on technology, politics and the news media, says that Libs of TikTok is akin to an “organized watchdog group,” but notes that this situation isn’t new. Opposition research is a tactic that’s been used by political activists for decades.

“You comb through somebody’s past and you find things that could discredit them, and you use that in order to help you achieve your political goals,” Ursher said. “And the difference now is that that has been democratized and anybody can be part of that.”

A Navy official confirmed that it’s “actively reviewing reports” of sailors whose social media activity is “misaligned with the Department’s current social media guidance,” but did not elaborate further on what exactly the current guidance entails.

However, there is a social media handbook[4] for the Navy that outlines expectations for sailors’ online conduct. The handbook states that active-duty sailors can express personal views about public issues or political candidates using social media, though they can’t engage in partisan political activity, such as posting a link to a political party or campaign.

Marra has spent much of her medical career in San Diego. She completed her internship and residency in family medicine at the Naval Hospital at Camp Pendleton in 2011, according to[5] the American Medical Women’s Association. She completed a fellowship in primary care sports medicine at the naval hospital a few years later.

She also has experience presenting on health care for the LGBTQ+ community and women, which she describes on her LinkedIn as a “focus” of her work.

“She treated me like a real person and not a number,” said Parker Moore, a nuclear reactor electronics technician in the Navy and one of Marra’s current patients.

Moore has been seeing Marra as their primary care doctor for the last few months. After 13 years of service, Moore is being separated from the Navy under the Trump administration’s ban on transgender service members, but says they’re not seeing Marra for transgender health care.

“None of my medical things are transgender related, which a lot of providers relate everything to,” Moore said, adding that Marra’s understanding of trans health means she doesn’t jump to it as a conclusion for all ailments.

Marra’s LinkedIn profile has been updated over the last few weeks. While it still lists her pronouns, the profile photo was removed, it no longer includes any leadership positions within the Navy and now issues a disclaimer: “This profile does not represent the opinions of the DoD, DHA, Navy or other government entities.”

Marra had the role of deputy medical director for transgender health care on her LinkedIn. But it’s a role that doesn’t appear to exist, at least not anymore.

“The Department does not have a transgender health center,” a Defense Health Agency spokesperson said. “It was considered last year but the idea was abandoned.”

Since taking office, the Trump administration has taken significant steps to roll back key protections for the LGBTQ+ community – specifically, transgender people. Trump’s policies have especially impacted service members and veterans, including an executive order that bans transgender troops[6] and another that bars trans veterans from receiving gender-affirming care through the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Earlier this year, as part of the implementation of the executive order banning transgender troops, the U.S. Air Force issued a memo prohibiting the use of “preferred pronouns” in official communications – though it was quickly rescinded. A 2024 law[7] prohibits the department secretary from requiring or prohibiting a member of the armed forces or civilian employee from using personal pronouns in official correspondence.

Marra’s wife says their family has received hateful messages and read demeaning online posts about them since Hegseth posted about Marra on X a few weeks ago. She said that while she tries to avoid reading them, she reviews some to assess for any credible threats.

It’s also hard for her to send Marra off to work each day, she said, not knowing if it might be her last day on the job.

Marra is the family’s primary provider; Cassandra works part-time as an instructor at a local community college. And since both their children have autism and are receiving health care through Marra’s job with the Navy, Cassandra worries about what could happen if Marra ultimately does lose her job in the service.

“We just keep waiting,” she said. “And that’s part of the frustrating part: you sit there and you wait.”

© 2025 The San Diego Union-Tribune.

Visit sandiegouniontribune.com[8].

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.[9]

© Copyright 2025 The San Diego Union-Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more

More Articles …