The Power of Truth® has been released for sale and assignment to a conservative pro-American news outlet, cable network, or other media outlet that wants to define and brand its operation as the bearer of the truth, and set itself above the competition.

In every news story the audience hears of censorship, speech, and the truth. The Power of Truth® has significant value to define an outlet, and expand its audience. A growing media outlet may decide to rebrand their operation The Power of Truth®. An established outlet may choose to make it the slogan distinguishing their operation from the competition. You want people to think of your outlet when they hear it, and think of the slogan when they see your company name. It is the thing which answers the consumer's questions: Why should I choose you? Why should I listen to you? Think:

  • What’s in your wallet -- Capital One
  • The most trusted name in news – CNN
  • Fair and balanced - Fox News
  • Where’s the beef -- Wendy’s
  • You’re in good hands -- Allstate
  • The ultimate driving machine -- BMW

The Power of Truth® is registered at the federal trademark level in all applicable trademark classes, and the sale and assignment includes the applicable domain names. The buyer will have both the trademark and the domains so that it will control its business landscape without downrange interference.

Contact: Truth@ThePowerOfTruth.com

Fox and Friends co-host Pete Hegseth

Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for defense secretary, was involved in an incident of alleged sexual assault in 2017 at a hotel in Monterey, California, according to local authorities.

The alleged incident occurred in the early hours of Oct. 8, 2017, and involved a victim who suffered bruising on their thigh, police records released by the City of Monterey show. Authorities did not disclose the age or identity of the alleged victim.

Tim Parlatore, Hegseth's personal lawyer since 2017, told Military.com on Friday that "as confirmed by the Monterey Police Department, there was an allegation that was fully investigated, and he was cleared of any wrongdoing."

Read Next: 'It Could Be Very Hard to Do Our Job': Top Military Officers Brace for Trump's Potential Loyalty Review Boards[1]

The nomination of Hegseth, a weekend host on Fox News and National Guard[2] veteran, to lead the Pentagon sent shockwaves through Washington and the defense community this week. As the U.S. military shifts focus from combating terrorism to countering China, Hegseth's selection has raised eyebrows, given his lack of experience within the defense community, but underscored Trump's appetite for disruption and his key promise to shake up the establishment.

It was still unclear Friday what Hegseth's priorities as secretary of defense would be, and his nomination must still be confirmed by the Senate -- unless Trump attempts to make his own appointments while Congress is in recess, sidestepping the typical vetting by the legislative branch of government. However, the Senate has not been in a true recess in years, specifically to prevent such moves by the executive branch.

Hegseth has long been a culture warrior protesting the military's so-called "woke" culture in various books and media appearances in recent years. Republicans have used the term to deride what they claim is the creep of liberal policies in the military in recent years. Most often, it refers to the growing number of minorities, women and other marginalized groups in the ranks, and policies that recognize and address them.

Among his criticisms, Hegseth has taken enormous issue with women in combat roles, saying female troops are a detriment to the effectiveness of front-line units. Women have long filled crucial roles in the military, but an exclusion on them serving in direct ground combat was lifted in 2013 by former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, the culmination of a long effort at equality in the ranks.

The disclosure of the alleged sexual assault call to police was revealed shortly after Hegseth's nomination was announced this week. He did not face any formal investigations into his conduct during his National Guard service, according to a spokesperson for the National Guard Bureau.

The National Guard also had not as of Friday disclosed Hegseth's full military record, to include his duty assignments, which could shed light on his qualifications.

His military background consists of a relatively unremarkable career, and he left the District of Columbia National Guard as a major in 2021 with just under 13 years of service.

Questions specifically about Hegseth's service in the D.C. National Guard and his role in the Guard's response to the insurrection of Jan. 6, 2021, by Trump supporters who falsely believed the presidential election had been stolen continue to go unanswered.

During a Thursday press briefing, reporters pressed Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh about Hegseth's tenure in the Guard. However, Singh provided little clarity.

"I was not here during that time, and we were going through our own transition as the incoming Biden administration," she said. "This is really something that the services would handle."

Hegseth ended his Guard career after being among at least a dozen Guardsmen removed from the Capitol defense mission in the wake of the Jan. 6 attack.

He has claimed he was labeled a security risk due to his Jerusalem cross tattoo. However, Hegseth also sports a "Deus Vult" cross tattoo, a symbol tied to the First Crusade. The phrase and cross have since been co-opted by neo-Nazi and far-right groups, raising further scrutiny of his background.

Related: 'He's Going to Have to Explain It': Surprise Defense Secretary Pick's History Takes Center Stage[3]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[4].

Read more

A painting shows Native Americans and soldiers during battle in a forest.Native American women, like their male counterparts, share a proud tradition of military service. 

During the Revolutionary War, Tyonajanegan, an Oneida, fought on the side of the United States with her husband during the Battle of Oriskany, Aug. 6, 1777, in

Read more

Military personnel whose promotions are being held up by Sen. Tuberville

While Pentagon officials are not willing to publicly weigh in on the emerging plans by President-elect Donald Trump to purge the military's ranks of many top officers, the Defense Department's spokeswoman says that removing a slew of admirals and generals would have serious impacts on missions and readiness.

"I'm not going to speak for the incoming administration or speak to any hypotheticals on what they will and won't do," Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh told reporters Thursday.

However, Singh did say that the idea of a sudden departure of multiple top leaders was something that the Pentagon already faced last year, when Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., held up hundreds of military promotions

Read Next: Military Suicides Rose in 2023, Continuing Upward Trend Pentagon Sees as 'Real Change'[1]

"You remember the time when we had a significant amount of holds on our general and flag officers," Singh said, referencing the roughly 10-month hold by Tuberville.

Tuberville placed a hold on all general and flag officer nominees in February in an effort to pressure the Pentagon to reverse its policy of covering travel and leave for service members who seek abortions.

Tuberville's hold gradually ballooned to cover more than 450 top leaders inside the Pentagon as he refused to relent despite arguments from Democrats, some Republicans, Pentagon officials and military families that he was harming national security and punishing military families for a policy they had no control over.

Singh said that this hold -- which effectively deprived the military of hundreds of generals and admirals -- could be analogous to the plans that are now coming from the Trump transition team.

"That's going to have an impact to operations, that's going to have an impact on morale, and that is going to have an impact on the department," Singh said, speaking on Tuberville's hold.

The idea of reviewing top generals and admirals became public on Tuesday, when The Wall Street Journal reported[2] that a draft executive order is being considered by the Trump transition team that would establish a "warrior board" that would review three- and four-star officers to determine whether they should continue to serve.

The proposal calls from conservative think tanks, lawmakers and Trump to weed out supposedly "woke" generals -- a term that has become overused to the point that it has lost much of its meaning. In this context, however, it seems to be broadly defined as officials who have promoted diversity in the ranks or supported the mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations.

On Wednesday, Reuters also reported[3] that members of Trump's transition team were also drawing up a list of military officers -- likely focused heavily on officers close to now-retired Gen. Mark Milley, who served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff -- to be fired.

In speaking with current and former generals, Military.com[4] found that they are concerned that the move will make their work much harder and politicize a force that is already struggling to stay outside the political fray.

"It could be very hard to do our job if we have to constantly be making sure we're appeasing someone on a political or partisan level," one currently serving Army[5] lieutenant general told Military.com earlier this week.

Officials in the Pentagon also noted that the idea that current three- and four-star leaders are somehow suddenly unqualified to lead is curious, given how much selection and vetting they go through to rise through the ranks.

Congress votes on every officer's promotion from O-4, major or lieutenant commander, all the way to general or admiral. Additionally, each service mandates various screenings and selection processes itself that only increase as a service member moves up the ranks.

Aside from the operational impacts a proposed purge would have, it is likely to also force junior and mid-grade officers to rethink their careers in the military.

Amid Tuberville's hold, the four service secretaries wrote an editorial[6] where they noted that "the generals and admirals who will be leading our forces a decade from now are colonels and captains today," and "they are watching this spectacle and might conclude that their service at the highest ranks of our military is no longer valued by members of Congress or, by extension, the American public."

But so far the Pentagon has made no public comment on the Trump transition team plans to purge military leadership.

"Again, I'm not going to speak to the hypothetical of what you're referencing," Singh said when asked about the potential Trump policies. "Whenever you have or put a strain on the system where there are not enough people in a position, or not enough people sharing the burden of work, of course, it's going to strain the system."

Related: 'It Could Be Very Hard to Do Our Job': Top Military Officers Brace for Trump's Potential Loyalty Review Boards[7]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[8].

Read more

More Articles …