Bree Fram was an Air Force[1] major in 2016 when word came down that the Obama administration would soon be lifting its ban on transgender troops serving in the military following a yearlong study and orders for commanders to educate themselves and their units on integrating transgender personnel.

It was during President Barack Obama's first term in 2011 that "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," the then-nearly 18-year-old ban on gay and lesbian troops serving openly, had ended. Despite some resistance in Congress, the intervening five years had gone smoothly, with few noteworthy hurdles for units adjusting to the more tolerant stance. Now, the administration wanted to open up service further.

Moments after the new policy supporting trans service members was approved, Fram sent an email to her colleagues and posted to Facebook disclosing that she identified as a woman. After clicking send, she got up from her desk, bolted to the gym and hopped on an elliptical in the lower levels of the Pentagon to work off the adrenaline, unsure of exactly what the response would be.

"I went nowhere faster than I'd ever gone in my life with all that nervous energy that I had," she quipped.

Whenever policies tied to who can serve and how have changed in the military, be it the ending of segregation in the ranks or inclusion of women in new specialties, there were warnings from those opposed that troops wouldn't accept their fellow service members and that unit cohesion would suffer.

But when she got back to her desk after the workout, Fram started to get a steady stream of colleagues stopping by. They shook her hand and told her, "It's an honor to serve with you."

The new norm of open service would last only a year.

In 2017, President Donald Trump began via tweet to unravel that policy and set off a yearslong process that culminated in the Pentagon not accepting new transgender service members and not providing existing troops with care for gender dysphoria, the medical term for identifying with a gender different than that assigned at birth, if they had not already been out and previously diagnosed.

"So no one new could come out within the military, and no one who was trans could get into the military," Fram explained. "We were functionally an endangered species within the service, but were allowed to continue serving and continue receiving care."

Fram, like the eight other transgender service members interviewed by Military.com for this story, noted that she was expressing her personal views and not speaking on behalf of the Defense Department or her service branch.

Fram said that, when the policy on trangender service members was reversed again five days into President Joe Biden's administration in 2021, it provided more acceptance but further illustrated the roller-coaster of policy changes that transgender service members had to navigate. She's now a colonel in the Space Force[2] and one of the most senior openly transgender officers serving in the military.

U.S. Space Force Lt Col. Bree Fram, an astronautical engineer, talks with attendees at a Pride Month event at Altus Air Force Base, June 5, 2023. (Airman 1st Class Heidi Bucins/U.S. Air Force photo)

Trump promised on the campaign trail to end acceptance of transgender service members, and several news outlets reported on a proposed executive order[3] that would medically discharge all trans service members from the military. Whether or not that order, or another like it, comes to fruition, Fram said the advice she gives to fellow transgender service members remains the same as during the first Trump-era ban.

"Lace up your boots and go get the job done, until or unless you get dragged out of the service and serving the country that you love so much and care about," Fram said.

The Department of Defense does not track the number of transgender service members, leaving a significant gap in reliable data. A 2016 study conducted by Rand Corp. estimated that between 1,300 and 6,600 transgender troops were serving at that time. Some studies and advocacy groups place that estimate much higher at about 15,000.

Transgender troops' right to serve -- perhaps even to fight and die for a nation they volunteered to defend -- has been subject to a whiplash-inducing series of policy reversals and partisan squabbles and created uncertainty as to what they will confront in the coming years.

But the nine transgender service members who spoke to Military.com delivered one uniform message: Their units have accepted them, and they just want to serve their country.

'I Love My Job'

Sgt. 1st Class Cathrine Schmid is not just a soldier; military service is woven into the fabric of her being. Mention the Army[4], and her eyes light up. A noncommissioned officer to her core, Schmid's dedication isn't performative patriotism wrapped in slogans and sentiment. It's visceral.

"I love my job," she says. "I really like being in the Army. I love soldiers. I love being around soldiers; I love talking to soldiers."

Schmid transitioned a decade ago, a decision that sparked some initial upheaval in the ranks she served in, but she was ultimately accepted by her commanders, even if they lacked the vocabulary or experience to fully understand her journey. Her identity is remarkably a nonfactor in her day-to-day Army life. Over several years, her medical leave amounted to no more than eight weeks, comparable to the recovery from a routine airborne school injury. For Schmid, her transition wasn't a disruption; it was simply part of her story.

She's a high performer and part of the Sergeant Audie Murphy Club, among the most prestigious stamps of approval for some of the Army's top-performing NCOs, with troops having to demonstrate expert marksmanship, earn top scores on the service's fitness test, and go through a meticulous interview process.

Sgt. 1st Class Cathrine Schmid takes the Army Combat Fitness Test in December 2023. (Photo courtesy of Cathrine Schmid)

"I've got the institutional power of the senior NCO, I've got the shiny bits of metal on my uniform that say I've earned my place, and that isn't true for everybody," Schmid said. "I've been in long enough, and the military is close enough to a meritocracy, that people care less about whether I'm trans and whether I'm qualified, which is one of the best things about the military."

Data points to a seismic shift in Gen Z attitudes toward the LGBTQ+ community, with nearly 28% of young adults identifying as gay, lesbian, transgender or queer, Public Religion Research Institute, a nonprofit that researches public perception on cultural issues, found in a study[5] published earlier this year.

But despite the changing demographics, the incoming administration has specifically articulated a desire to prevent some of those same young adults from serving, despite the military services facing ongoing struggles effectively adding new recruits.

Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News personality and a 13-year National Guard[6] veteran who has been tabbed by Trump to serve as his secretary of defense, slammed in his 2024 book, "The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free," what he perceived as a push to fill the ranks with LGBTQ+ troops, falsely suggesting recruiting[7] ads were targeting those demographics. A Military.com review of recruiting ads in the last half decade found that most military marketing spotlights men and makes no suggestions of their sexual orientation, and that there has been no systemic push to pitch service to LGBTQ+ Americans.

"Not only do the trannies and lesbians not join, but those very same ads turn off the young, patriotic, Christian men who have traditionally filled out ranks," Hegseth, whose confirmation is facing headwinds[8] tied to scrutiny of past infidelity, excessive drinking and alleged sexual assault, said in his book.

Throughout the Biden administration, Republican lawmakers and conservative media personalities have lambasted the military as being "woke," a nonspecific shorthand for acquiescence to progressive ideals, and for filling the ranks with those from the LGBTQ+ community, though there's little demographic evidence of a seismic change to the composition of the force. Those in service leadership don't see recent efforts at acceptance as interfering with the military's mission.

"Funny enough, there's a lot more room on the Left to hit us on making no effort to recruit these people," one Army marketing official told Military.com on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the press, referring to LGBTQ+ groups. "Most of our stuff is dudes jumping out of airplanes and such, same ads we've been putting out for half a century, not targeting any specific demographics ... which has been part of our problem."

Acceptance in the Force

Transgender soldiers are now serving across a range of roles within the U.S. Army, including in front-line units and Special Forces[9]. For many of the nine transgender service members who spoke with Military.com -- their ranks spanning from junior soldiers to senior officers -- their experiences have generally been positive. While some acknowledge the possibility of occasional mockery behind their backs, they said the overall treatment from their peers and commanders has been respectful, and they feel accepted within their formations.

Yet, despite this camaraderie, some transgender service members believe that their careers may face obstacles. A number of them suspect that they have been sidelined from key training opportunities, prestigious assignments or advanced schools, with some of these setbacks seemingly stemming from commanders -- often older officers -- who may not have ever met a trans person before.

"There was an NCO who openly said some bigoted things. He called me a tranny to my face," one soldier told Military.com. "When I first started to use female facilities, I was terrified of getting rejected by other women. But they were all remarkably kind; they could probably see how visibly fearful I was. I always went to the showers with at least one female friend for protection. There was always a fear of rejection from other women."

Defense Secretary Ash Carter announces a new transgender policy for the Department of Defense at the Pentagon, June 30, 2016. (Petty Officer 1st Class Tim D. Godbee/U.S. Navy photo)

Navy[10] Cmdr. Emily Shilling, call sign "Hawking" for her love of physics, has spent nearly 20 years as a standout in the U.S. military. A decorated pilot with 60 combat missions from deployments[11] on the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln, Shilling has flown the EA-6B Prowler[12], EA-18 Growler[13], and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet[14] -- some of the Navy's most advanced jets.

But as the Trump administration prepares to take office, Shilling, who is transgender, is bracing for what could be a career-ending policy shift. As president of SPARTA, an advocacy group for transgender service members, she is deeply aware of what's at stake. With 19 years and five months in uniform, Shilling is just shy of the 20-year milestone needed for military retirement[15] benefits. If a new administration policy leads to her discharge, she could lose not only her pension but also access to the Defense Department's health care program. Also, depending on what type of discharge she receives, her children may lose access to her post-9/11 GI Bill[16] benefits.

She wants to serve for 26 years and aims to make captain.

She's also fighting for the future of others in her position, arguing that exclusion weakens the military. "History has shown that opening the military to qualified individuals makes us stronger," she said.

"We saw it with women. We saw it with people of color. This has held true for every group that was once excluded," she said, adding that she was sharing her views as a transgender service member and president of SPARTA, not as a representative of the Navy.

SPARTA is gearing up for what could be another fight over who is allowed to serve in uniform. Shilling said the organization is focused on preparing its 2,200 members for the worst. The group is prioritizing job placement and fundraising for medical expenses to support troops who might lose access to the military health system. "We'll let the legal experts take the lead," she said. "Our job is to make sure our people are taken care of."

She says she is tired of what she calls the "distraction" of the discussion.

"We've been serving openly for [nearly] 10 years now, and we just want to get back to fighting our nation's battles and defending the U.S.," she said.

Related: Trump Reportedly Weighs Immediate Discharge of All Transgender Troops. Here's What That Would Mean.[17]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[18].

Read more

The U.S. Capitol in Washington is illuminated at night on April 7, 2011, as Congress work late to avert a government shutdown.

Despite anger from Democratic lawmakers at language that would restrict health care for transgender children of service members, the annual defense policy bill with a massive pay raise[1] for junior enlisted troops was approved by the House on Wednesday.

The House voted 281-140 to approve the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, sending it to the Senate, which is expected to approve the bill next week.

Under the bill, troops in the ranks of E-1 through E-4 will see a 14.5% raise next year[2], while all other service members will get a 4.5% pay bump.

Read Next: Army Cuts Popular Education Benefit in Half, Bars Officers as Costs Soar[3]

The significant raise for the military's most junior troops was one of several measures included in the final NDAA aimed at improving service member quality of life that had widespread bipartisan approval.

But despite supporting the quality-of-life provisions, House Democrats largely turned against the NDAA after Republicans successfully included a provision that could prevent troops' transgender children from getting some types of medical care.

Specifically, the bill would bar Tricare[4] from covering "medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization" for beneficiaries under 18.

The bill does not define exactly which treatments would be banned, but advocates have warned the language could mean military kids will lose access to hormone therapy and puberty-suppressant medications.

Tricare has covered nonsurgical gender-affirming health care, such as hormones and mental health counseling, for dependents since 2016[5]. Gender-affirmation surgery is available only to service members.

It's unclear exactly how many military children are currently receiving treatment for gender dysphoria through Tricare. One study found that more than 2,500 children[6] received some form of transgender-related care through Tricare from 2009 to 2017. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, estimated earlier this week that 6,000 to 7,000 children could be affected by the NDAA ban.

Democratic leadership did not direct their members to vote against the NDAA over the transgender provision, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., told reporters Wednesday morning. But influential Democrats such as Smith railed against its inclusion in the compromise bill.

"The inclusion of this harmful provision puts the lives of children at risk and may force thousands of service members to make the choice of continuing their military service or leaving to ensure their child can get the health care they need," Smith said in a statement Tuesday announcing he would oppose final passage of the bill he helped negotiate.

Ultimately, 81 Democrats supported the NDAA, compared to 124 who voted against it. Meanwhile, 16 Republicans voted against the bill.

Most GOP-supported provisions aimed at culture war issues that were in earlier drafts of this year's NDAA were taken out of the compromise bill, including one that would have also barred gender-affirming care for service members and another that would have reversed the Pentagon's policy of providing leave and travel reimbursement for troops seeking abortions and other reproductive care.

But Republicans touted the language targeting care for transgender minors as a major win.

"We banned Tricare from prescribing treatments that would ultimately sterilize our kids," House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said at a news conference Tuesday while lauding the NDAA agreement. Tricare, as an insurance provider, doesn't advocate for specific medical treatments but rather pays for care.

Research on the long-term effects of puberty blockers on fertility is "currently limited and provides varied results," while hormone therapy may decrease fertility in certain circumstances, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. Still, the organization, along with most other major medical associations, endorses the care[7].

Action on the NDAA now moves to the Senate, which is controlled by Democrats. Democratic Senate leaders have not publicly commented on the transgender provision, but similar language was included in the version of the NDAA[8] that the Senate Armed Services Committee advanced in June.

President Joe Biden will also need to sign the bill before it becomes law. While the White House has previously criticized efforts to limit gender-affirming care for military children, the administration has not issued a statement on its position on the NDAA compromise.

Related: Health Care for Transgender Military Kids Could Be Banned by Must-Pass Defense Bill[9]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[10].

Read more

WASHINGTON -- Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee to lead the Defense Department, said he had a "wonderful conversation" with Maine Sen. Susan Collins on Wednesday as he pushed to win enough votes for confirmation. He said he will not back down after allegations of excessive drinking and sexual misconduct.

Collins said after the hourlong meeting that she questioned Hegseth about the allegations amid reports of drinking and the revelation that he made a settlement payment after being accused of a sexual assault[1] that he denies. She said she had a "good, substantive" discussion with Hegseth and "covered a wide range of topics," including sexual assault in the military, Ukraine and NATO. But she said she would wait until a hearing, and notably a background check, to make a decision.

"I asked virtually every question under the sun," Collins told reporters as she left her office after the meeting. "I pressed him both on his position on military issues as well as the allegations against him, so I don't think there was anything that we did not cover."

The meeting with Collins was closely watched as she is seen as more likely than most of her Republican Senate colleagues to vote against some of Trump's Cabinet picks. She and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, a fellow moderate Republican, did not shy from opposing Trump in his first term when they wanted to do so and sometimes supported President Joe Biden's nominees for the judicial and executive branches.

And Hegseth, an infantry combat veteran and former "Fox & Friends" weekend host, is working to gain as many votes as he can as some senators have expressed concerns about his personal history and lack of management experience.

"I'm certainly not going to assume anything about where the senator stands," Hegseth said as he left Collins' office. "This is a process that we respect and appreciate. And we hope, in time, overall, when we get through that committee and to the floor that we can earn her support."

Hegseth met with Murkowski on Tuesday. He has also been meeting repeatedly with Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, a military veteran who has said she is a survivor of sexual assault and has spent time in the Senate working on improving how attacks are reported and prosecuted within the ranks. On Monday, Ernst said after a meeting with him that he had committed to selecting a senior official to prioritize those goals.

Republicans will have a 53-49 majority next year, meaning Trump cannot lose more than three votes on any of his nominees. It is so far unclear whether Hegseth will have enough support, but Trump has stepped up his pressure on senators in the last week.

"Pete is a WINNER, and there is nothing that can be done to change that!!!" Trump posted on his social media platform last week.

© Copyright 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more

U.S. Army Maj. Gen. James P. Isenhower III, commanding general of the 1st Armored Division, administers the oath of enlistment to recruits at the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) at El Paso, Texas.

New polling data from the Pentagon finds that 60% of young female adults in the U.S. have never considered joining the military or pictured themselves in uniform, largely for reasons that could be addressed by targeted recruiting[1] and educational outreach, a Defense Department official said Tuesday.

An update on the female military recruiting market[2] presented to the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services found that most young women in America don't know anything about the U.S. military, and what they know comes largely from television or popular media.

Given these sources, they believe that if they join a service, they will spend four years not being able to express opinions or make decisions, and when they return to civilian life, they will have readjustment issues, according to Jeremy Hall, director of the DoD's Joint Advertising Market Research and Studies.

Read Next: Army Secretary Fires 4-Star General Who Meddled in Promotion of Unfit Subordinate[3]

"They think four years in the military genuinely is a boot camp video that they can see on YouTube," Hall said. "This is really steeped in popular media, in what they see and how service and service members are portrayed -- that noble yet damaged warrior haunted by their military experience because the military does not have a presence in many communities."

These attitudes have significant implications for the armed services, which have struggled in the past several years to recruit members. While the services met their accession goals in fiscal 2024, they still face challenges getting qualified members. Just one-quarter of American young people meet eligibility requirements -- 25% of young men and 21% of young women, according to the data provided to DACOWITS.

The top reasons young women aren't eligible to join are, in order: physical or medical conditions; weight; and mental health disorders. The three reasons, also in order, that young American men don't qualify are: drug abuse; weight; and physical or medical conditions.

According to the polling, the overall interest in joining the military among American youth has dropped from an average 13% from 2012 to 2019 to 10% in the last five years.

The data shows that American teenage girls tend to have higher grades in high school, with 74% of those surveyed earning mostly As and Bs compared with boys at 60%, and have higher educational goals than their male counterparts, with 47% wanting to earn a master's, doctoral or professional degree compared with males at 33%.

With those aspirations, Hall said, many see military service as an unnecessary delay or incompatible with achieving their goals.

The top reasons given by potential male and female recruits for not joining the military were the possibilities of physical injury or death, developing psychological issues, and leaving family and friends.

Women expressed concerns about sexual assault and harassment as a primary reason for not wanting to join; 53% said it was a concern, compared with 11% of men.

Many women polled also expressed low confidence in their ability to succeed.

"Only about a quarter of youth think they'd probably be successful," Hall said.

Young women said, however, that the top reasons they would join the military would be for pay[4] and to cover education costs. Young men said their top reasons were for pay and health care.

With those thoughts in mind, Hall said, there are opportunities to again market the military as a place to meet people, travel, gain experience and earn GI Bill[5] benefits.

"I can take advantage of paying for it, my education. I can get work skills and experiences. I can get good experiences. I can have camaraderie. These are all factors that they see as benefits of military service," Hall said.

Concerns have risen among women service members in the past month over their futures, given remarks made by Army National Guard[6] veteran and former Fox News host Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for secretary of defense.

On the Shawn Ryan Show podcast Nov. 7[7], Hegseth said "straight up ... we shouldn't have women in combat roles. It hasn't made us more effective; it hasn't made us more lethal, it has made fighting more complicated."

But Hegseth walked back those statements Monday during an appearance on Fox News[8] as he lobbies for Senate confirmation.

"Some of our greatest warriors, our best warriors out there, are women who served, raised their right hand to serve this country and love our nation and want to defend that flag, and they do it every single day around the globe," Hegseth said.

Hall said the Defense Department is using his office's information, which is drawn from focus groups with youth ages 16 to 21 and "influencers," including parents and other family members, educators and coaches, to craft outreach programs, public service ads and education.

He said he'd like to see the Reserve and National Guard components reach out in their communities to educate local youth about the concept of part-time service, which he added that high schoolers simply don't comprehend.

And he'd like recruiters to be given the time to engage with local residents -- at community events, football games, parades -- especially in locations that don't have a large community presence.

Recruiters, he said, face immense pressure in the current environment to make quotas and have little time simply to be available.

"I think more physical presence in the community is how we start to drastically reverse these trends," Hall said.

Related: Prep Courses, Policy Tweaks Largely Drove the Military's Recruiting Success in 2024[9]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[10].

Read more

More Articles …