The Pentagon has asked its internal watchdog, the inspector general, to probe the military day care system's handling of abuse cases -- a move that came late Wednesday, just hours after an investigative report^[1] by Military.com was published.

The Military.com investigation revealed that service branch rules generally prioritize protecting base day care centers over children who are victims of emotional and physical abuse at the hands of staff. Reporting further revealed how policies keep parents in the dark while officials formulate a public relations response and have minimal safeguards to guarantee accountability.

"It is paramount that we ensure children on DoD installations are provided a safe, healthy, and caring environment -- and their families have confidence in the care provided," Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, the Pentagon's chief spokesman, told Military.com in an email announcing the referral of the issue to the DoD inspector general.

Read Next: Army Orders More Helicopter Pilot Training After Spate of 12 Crashes Kills, Injures Soldiers^[2]

Ryder further promised the office will "work together with the military departments to ensure CDC [child development centers] facilities and staff meet the highest standards of care for our children and to promote appropriate accountability."

The inspector general's office told Military.com in an email that it was reviewing the request "to determine the appropriate course of action" and had no further comment.

The Defense Department's swift response, especially as a reaction to reporting, is rare. The IG is an independent watchdog agency within the department and, while unlikely in this instance, it does have the authority to turn down such a referral.

An IG investigation itself doesn't necessarily mean individuals will be held accountable, but it could shed more light on the issue and potentially serve as ammunition for regulation changes or action on Capitol Hill.

Jeremy Kuykendall, an Army^[3] captain and the father of one of the abuse victims, told Military.com that he was grateful and cautiously optimistic about the referral to the IG, but said the overall situation has still left him feeling frustrated and betrayed.

"There's not what you build into the culture and ethos and understanding of trust; you have to have each other's back, right?" Kuykendall said Thursday. "You have to go to war, not [be] questioning the liability of the people to your left and right. So, you're not thinking about remote problems, like accountability issues within a day care incident, but it's connected."

Kuykendall's daughter Isabella was abused over her three-day time at the Ford Island day care at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam^[4] in Hawaii in 2022. CCTV footage showed that she, then 15 months old, was pinched, smothered, thrown up against a wall and handled so roughly at the hands of two workers that a pediatrician believed she even suffered a concussion in addition to bruises and scratches.

Throughout the investigation, Military.com spoke to a dozen families and their lawyers, all with similar stories of not being told when their child was injured and, in many cases, parents assuming hefty legal bills to force the military branches to tell them what happened.

Despite Military.com collecting instances of military leadership admitting failures, finger-pointing and weaponized ignorance often won out in the cases analyzed by the publication, leading to little or no accountability taken or changes made.

In one case, this enabled one of the workers who abused Bella and who was later found guilty of assault in a civilian court to keep working at the day care for an additional five months after the abuse was discovered, despite the Navy^[5] having been made aware of the worker's involvement.

Although rare, this is the second time in three weeks that a Military.com report has yielded a potential IG investigation.

Late last month, the Army referred the case of Gen. Charles Hamilton^[6] to the Defense Department inspector general for investigation, following a Military.com report that showed Hamilton may have used a "pressure campaign" to influence the Army Command Assessment Program panel in favor of one of his former subordinate officers, a lieutenant colonel.

Army Secretary Christine Wormuth suspended Gen. Charles Hamilton^[7] on March 22 and referred the case to the IG after reporting revealed that, even though the assessment process ultimately found the officer unqualified due to ineffective and counterproductive leadership, she was still later placed on a selection list for command.

No wrongdoing was suspected on the lieutenant colonel's part.

-- Rachel Nostrant is a Marine Corps^[8] veteran and freelance journalist, with work published in Reuters, New York Magazine, Military Times and more.

Related: Unsupervised: Military Child Care Centers Slow to Report Abuse with Little Oversight^[9]

The Department of Defense will expand its investigation into the prevalence of "forever chemicals" in base drinking water systems and neighboring water supplies following the Environmental Protection Agency's publication of stricter standards for the synthetic substances.

The EPA announced Wednesday new national limits for six types^[1] of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, in drinking water supplies. Many of these chemicals have been used extensively on military installations in firefighting foams, industrial solvents, non-stick coatings and other products, causing widespread contamination of groundwater, soil and adjacent communities.

Since 2016, the Defense Department has conducted assessments or investigated the use of PFAS and related contamination at 715 active and former military installations, National Guard^[2] facilities and other closed defense sites.

Read Next:Unsupervised: Military Child Care Centers Slow to Report Abuse with Little Oversight^[3]

As of December, the DoD had completed assessments of 707 installations, finding that 574 needed to proceed to the next step of the cleanup process, while no further action was required at 133 installations.

The stricter standards may mean, however, that some sites considered to need no or limited remediation may require more attention.

The Defense Department has used firefighting foams containing certain types of PFAS chemicals for more than 50 years. Many DoD sites determined to be contaminated have high levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate, or PFOS, and perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA, in drinking water above the EPA's former lifetime recommendation of 70 parts per trillion.

The EPA's new standard drops the contamination standard for PFOA and PFOS to 4 parts per trillion each, a change that a DoD official said the department has been preparing for.

In an email to Military.com, Pentagon spokesman Robert Ditchey said the department, in anticipation of the tighter restrictions, reviewed existing samples taken from on-base water supplies to determine whether levels met the new standards and will expand cleanup investigations in neighboring communities to do the same.

The DoD plans to provide drinking water treatment for wells off base that don't meet the new standards and also will develop cleanup plans for those sites within a five-year timeframe set by the EPA, Ditchey added.

"The department supports EPA's development of a nationwide drinking water standard for PFAS that applies to everyone," Ditchey wrote. "DoD has been preparing to implement the final rule for both our on-base DoD drinking water systems and within our cleanup program."

A federal study of U.S. military firefighters published last year showed a direct link between PFAS chemicals and testicular cancer^[4], and the chemicals also have been tied to kidney cancer.

PFAS chemicals also have been linked to certain other types of cancer, increased cholesterol, high blood pressure in pregnant women, lower birth weights and decreased immune response to vaccines.

EPA officials estimate that the federal rule will reduce PFAS exposure in drinking water for about 100 million people. When the announcement was made, environmental advocates praised the move -- the first time in nearly 30 years the EPA has added a standard for new contaminants.

"Today, we can celebrate a huge -- and long overdue -- victory for public health in this country," Robert Bilott, a Cincinnati-based environmental attorney who has represented members of class-action suits against chemical manufacturers DuPont and 3M, said in a statement.

"The U.S. EPA is finally moving forward to protect drinking water across the United States by adopting federally enforceable limits on some of the most toxic, persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals ever found in our nation's drinking water supply," Bilott added.

The Pentagon announced last year it would stop buying firefighting foams containing PFAS chemicals and halt their use altogether by the end of 2024. While the services have largely phased out the use of aqueous film forming foams containing PFAS for training, the chemicals are still used to fight fires on ships and submarines and in aircraft hangars and locations such as fuel farms, since an effective substitute has yet to be developed.

There are thousands of different types of PFAS compounds, known as "forever chemicals" because they are difficult to destroy and don't break down naturally in the environment.

They accumulate in the bloodstream and soft tissue of the human body, and nearly every American has some level of contamination.

The new EPA rules also set individual limits for three other compounds -- PFHxS, PFNA and GenX -- of 10 parts per trillion and institute a "hazard index," or recommended threshold, for those chemicals when combined with the PFAS compound PFBS.

According to Ditchey, the DoD expects that, after it reexamines drinking water supplies or after its ongoing community testing and cleanup, "a significant number of additional wells will require treatment."

"DoD will first prioritize locations where known levels of PFAS in drinking water from DoD activities are the highest. To expedite implementation of more enduring solutions, the DoD will focus on installing treatment systems, such as whole house filters," Ditchey said.

The Pentagon has requested $1.6 billion in its fiscal 2025 budget for PFAS cleanup of contaminated sites. The funding is $100 million more than the department's fiscal 2024 request.

The DoD maintains a website^[5] that provides information about its efforts to investigate and clean up contamination related to military activities.

Related: US Military Says National Security Depends on 'Forever Chemicals'^[6]