The Power of Truth® has been released for sale and assignment to a conservative pro-American news outlet, cable network, or other media outlet that wants to define and brand its operation as the bearer of the truth, and set itself above the competition.

In every news story the audience hears of censorship, speech, and the truth. The Power of Truth® has significant value to define an outlet, and expand its audience. A growing media outlet may decide to rebrand their operation The Power of Truth®. An established outlet may choose to make it the slogan distinguishing their operation from the competition. You want people to think of your outlet when they hear it, and think of the slogan when they see your company name. It is the thing which answers the consumer's questions: Why should I choose you? Why should I listen to you? Think:

  • What’s in your wallet -- Capital One
  • The most trusted name in news – CNN
  • Fair and balanced - Fox News
  • Where’s the beef -- Wendy’s
  • You’re in good hands -- Allstate
  • The ultimate driving machine -- BMW

The Power of Truth® is registered at the federal trademark level in all applicable trademark classes, and the sale and assignment includes the applicable domain names. The buyer will have both the trademark and the domains so that it will control its business landscape without downrange interference.

Contact: Truth@ThePowerOfTruth.com

Sailors assigned to Nimitz-class nuclear aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) sweep the flight deck

The Department of Defense will expand its investigation into the prevalence of "forever chemicals" in base drinking water systems and neighboring water supplies following the Environmental Protection Agency's publication of stricter standards for the synthetic substances.

The EPA announced Wednesday new national limits for six types[1] of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, in drinking water supplies. Many of these chemicals have been used extensively on military installations in firefighting foams, industrial solvents, non-stick coatings and other products, causing widespread contamination of groundwater, soil and adjacent communities.

Since 2016, the Defense Department has conducted assessments or investigated the use of PFAS and related contamination at 715 active and former military installations, National Guard[2] facilities and other closed defense sites.

Read Next:Unsupervised: Military Child Care Centers Slow to Report Abuse with Little Oversight[3]

As of December, the DoD had completed assessments of 707 installations, finding that 574 needed to proceed to the next step of the cleanup process, while no further action was required at 133 installations.

The stricter standards may mean, however, that some sites considered to need no or limited remediation may require more attention.

The Defense Department has used firefighting foams containing certain types of PFAS chemicals for more than 50 years. Many DoD sites determined to be contaminated have high levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate, or PFOS, and perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA, in drinking water above the EPA's former lifetime recommendation of 70 parts per trillion.

The EPA's new standard drops the contamination standard for PFOA and PFOS to 4 parts per trillion each, a change that a DoD official said the department has been preparing for.

In an email to Military.com, Pentagon spokesman Robert Ditchey said the department, in anticipation of the tighter restrictions, reviewed existing samples taken from on-base water supplies to determine whether levels met the new standards and will expand cleanup investigations in neighboring communities to do the same.

The DoD plans to provide drinking water treatment for wells off base that don't meet the new standards and also will develop cleanup plans for those sites within a five-year timeframe set by the EPA, Ditchey added.

"The department supports EPA's development of a nationwide drinking water standard for PFAS that applies to everyone," Ditchey wrote. "DoD has been preparing to implement the final rule for both our on-base DoD drinking water systems and within our cleanup program."

A federal study of U.S. military firefighters published last year showed a direct link between PFAS chemicals and testicular cancer[4], and the chemicals also have been tied to kidney cancer.

PFAS chemicals also have been linked to certain other types of cancer, increased cholesterol, high blood pressure in pregnant women, lower birth weights and decreased immune response to vaccines.

EPA officials estimate that the federal rule will reduce PFAS exposure in drinking water for about 100 million people. When the announcement was made, environmental advocates praised the move -- the first time in nearly 30 years the EPA has added a standard for new contaminants.

"Today, we can celebrate a huge -- and long overdue -- victory for public health in this country," Robert Bilott, a Cincinnati-based environmental attorney who has represented members of class-action suits against chemical manufacturers DuPont and 3M, said in a statement.

"The U.S. EPA is finally moving forward to protect drinking water across the United States by adopting federally enforceable limits on some of the most toxic, persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals ever found in our nation's drinking water supply," Bilott added.

The Pentagon announced last year it would stop buying firefighting foams containing PFAS chemicals and halt their use altogether by the end of 2024. While the services have largely phased out the use of aqueous film forming foams containing PFAS for training, the chemicals are still used to fight fires on ships and submarines and in aircraft hangars and locations such as fuel farms, since an effective substitute has yet to be developed.

There are thousands of different types of PFAS compounds, known as "forever chemicals" because they are difficult to destroy and don't break down naturally in the environment.

They accumulate in the bloodstream and soft tissue of the human body, and nearly every American has some level of contamination.

The new EPA rules also set individual limits for three other compounds -- PFHxS, PFNA and GenX -- of 10 parts per trillion and institute a "hazard index," or recommended threshold, for those chemicals when combined with the PFAS compound PFBS.

According to Ditchey, the DoD expects that, after it reexamines drinking water supplies or after its ongoing community testing and cleanup, "a significant number of additional wells will require treatment."

"DoD will first prioritize locations where known levels of PFAS in drinking water from DoD activities are the highest. To expedite implementation of more enduring solutions, the DoD will focus on installing treatment systems, such as whole house filters," Ditchey said.

The Pentagon has requested $1.6 billion in its fiscal 2025 budget for PFAS cleanup of contaminated sites. The funding is $100 million more than the department's fiscal 2024 request.

The DoD maintains a website[5] that provides information about its efforts to investigate and clean up contamination related to military activities.

Related: US Military Says National Security Depends on 'Forever Chemicals'[6]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[7].

Read more

Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall testifies

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado -- Department of the Air Force leaders are fiercely defending a legislative proposal to bypass state governors in order to move certain Air National Guard[1] units into the active-duty Space Force[2],

In response to a Military.com question during a press conference at the Space Symposium in Colorado on Wednesday, both Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall and Gen. Chance Saltzman, the Space Force's chief of space operations, said the impact to states would be minimal.

"The impact is really, I think, negligible. Governors may have a different view, but I don't see a reason why a state needs a Space Force militia," Kendall said. "The reason these units exist in the states is kind of an artifact of history, somewhat. I'd really like to get this resolved."

Read Next: Unsupervised: Military Child Care Centers Slow to Report Abuse with Little Oversight[3]

Last week, Military.com reported[4] that Air Force officials had submitted a draft legislative proposal to Congress titled "Transfer to the Space Force of covered space functions of the Air National Guard of the United States" that would change the status of such operations "from a unit of the Air National Guard of the United States to a unit of the United States Space Force; deactivate the unit; or assign the unit a new federal mission."

Air Force officials are seeking to waive Section 104 of Title 32 and Section 18238 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code, which state, respectively, that "no change in the branch, organization or allotment of a unit located entirely within a state may be made without the approval of its governor" and that National Guard units may "not be relocated or withdrawn under this chapter without the consent of the governor of the state."

Since the Space Force was formed in 2019 as part of the Department of the Air Force, a major point of contention has been what to do with the roughly 1,000 part-time Air National Guardsmen across 14 units operating space-related missions in Alaska, California, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, New York and Ohio.

The National Guard Association of the United States, a Washington, D.C.-based lobbying organization, quickly spoke out against the Air Force proposal. Internal surveys of those unit members show "that most do not want to transfer to the Space Force," the association said in a statement last week.

Governors from some of the states potentially affected by the Air Force proposal also objected strongly to the plan.

"Governors on both sides of the aisle call for the immediate discontinuation of legislative proposals that endanger or deny the full and legitimate authority of governors to act in the capacity of commander in chief to their respective National Guard across states and territories," Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, a Republican, and Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, a Democrat, said in a National Governors Association press release Tuesday[5].

Kendall dismissed concerns that the proposal would set a precedent undermining the governors' authority, saying the Air National Guard assets are necessary for the active-duty Space Force.

"We've had much, much more political attention over this than it deserves," Kendall said. "We need a way to integrate these space capabilities, which are very valuable to us, into the Space Force. This is a unique situation. I have no indication that either the Air Force or Army[6] Guard, anybody, is contemplating any other changes."

Some governors and National Guard Association officials have called for the creation of a Space National Guard. But the Department of the Air Force and the White House have pushed back against the effort and instead want to put Air National Guardsmen with space-related jobs in the Space Force's new part-time active-duty service model, which was approved in the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act.

Under that new legislation, the Space Force is already working on the transfer of full-time Air Force reservists with space-related units into the service, but Saltzman warned in a memo late last month[7] of the "sheer amount of work" required to get the part-time service model set up.

Despite the delays for the reservists, Saltzman defended the Department of the Air Force proposal, saying it also makes sense to eventually weave Air National Guard space units into the Space Force -- potentially under the part-time model proposed by the Space Force Personnel Management Act.

"In my estimation, the military effectiveness of those missions and taking care of those people is best performed as a single component using the same processes, procedures [and] management structure to take care of the people and to manage the missions," Saltzman said in response to Military.com's question.

The 2024 NDAA called for a report to "assess the feasibility and advisability of moving all units, personnel billets, equipment and resources performing core space functions under the operational control of the Space Force" from the Air National Guard.

At the symposium Wednesday, Kendall told Military.com that the report will be out "very shortly" but added, "It's not going to change our views."

Related: Air Force Proposes Bypassing Governors in 7 States to Move Guard Units into Space Force[8]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[9].

Read more

medication for a prescription at Naval Hospital Jacksonville Main Pharmacy.

Military pharmacies have returned to full operations following a crippling cyberattack in February on the company[1] that provides the Defense Health Agency's prescription processing program.

A Defense Health Agency spokesman said Tuesday that normal operations were restored April 2 between military pharmacies and Change Healthcare, one of the country's largest commercial prescription processors.

"A cyberattack on Change Healthcare ... was detected on Feb. 21, 2024. [Change Healthcare] severed all connectivity to DoD pharmacy systems on Feb. 22, 2024. As of April 2, 2024, normal operations have been restored for pharmacies at military clinics and hospitals," DHA spokesman Peter Graves said in an email to Military.com.

Read Next: Army Expanding Pre-Basic Training Prep Courses to Bring in More Soldiers and Curb Recruiting Crisis[2]

The restoration was first reported by Military Times[3].

Retail pharmacies across the country, including those aboard military installations, started experiencing disruptions due to the cyberattack Feb. 21 on Change Healthcare. As a result of the breach, military pharmacies were forced to fill prescriptions manually, with priority given to urgent prescriptions.

With the recovery, patients will be able to "access pharmacy services as usual," Graves said.

He added that beneficiaries don't need to take any action unless they used a Tricare[4] network pharmacy and had to pay for their prescriptions during the outage. In that case, they may be able to file a claim for reimbursement.

UnitedHealth Group, owner of Change Healthcare, initially said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it suspected a nation-state as being behind the attack. On Feb. 29, Change Healthcare said the "cybercrime threat actor" known as BlackCat/ALPHV was responsible for the breach.

The State Department has offered a reward of up to $10 million[5] for more information or identification of individuals with a leadership position in BlackCat/ALPHV and its ransomware operations.

Shortly after the attack, officials with the Defense Health Agency said that military hospitals and clinics would continue to provide pharmacy services "based on local manning and resources" and urged patience as the issue was resolved.

Change Healthcare halted its connectivity with the military health system as well as Express Scripts, the Tricare health program's pharmacy benefits manager, to protect patients' personal data, defense officials said.

After the breach, Change Healthcare has become the target of at least two dozen class-action lawsuits that allege that the company's security was inadequate. The suits have been filed by patients over concerns of data theft, as well as by providers who said they weren't paid while the system was offline.

Tricare beneficiaries who filled prescriptions at a retail pharmacy and were required to pay full price for their medications as a result of the cybercrime are encouraged to learn more at Tricare.com or call Express Scripts at 877-363-1303, Graves said.

Related: In Reversal, Defense Department Now Wants to Bring Tricare Beneficiaries Back to Military Health System[6]

© Copyright 2024 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[7].

Read more

More Articles …