All-female marksmanship SMEE

"Content not found." That was the message Friday on the webpage for the Marine Corps[1]' Culture and Inclusion Branch located in Quantico[2], Virginia.

The branch's page previously featured messages such as "treating each Marine, despite diverse backgrounds, with care and respect are fundamental to cohesion." But it was apparently pulled down this week as part of the military's frantic rush to scrub programs and policies that advocate for women, people from racial minority groups and LGBTQ+ troops.

The Army[3], Navy[4], Marine Corps, Air Force[5] and Space Force[6] -- as well as the Department of Veterans Affairs[7] -- were all working this week to comply with President Donald Trump's order Monday to end all federal equality and diversity efforts. But the hurry to eliminate the various programs and policies across the military led to a confusing landscape where seemingly unrelated policies were canceled and it was unclear what programs were still in effect.

Read Next: Inside the Military's Scramble to Move Troops to the Mexico Border[8]

No service had come forward by Friday with a comprehensive list of what programs and policies have been affected by the order.

The military has worked for years to improve the service experience for women and people with minority backgrounds -- and most recently, gay and transgender troops -- as the national recruiting[9] pool and general population have become more diverse. But those efforts became a political lightning rod amid attacks by Republicans claiming such "woke" policies have weakened the military. After being sworn in Monday, Trump carried out a promise to gut the programs across the federal government, including the military.

The service branches' communications to the rank and file and public about Trump's order were mixed. The Army[10] and Marine Corps[11] transmitted public messages that served as official guidance to their troops, while the Navy did not. The Air Force and Space Force also do not appear to have offered official guidance, issuing two memos primarily on their service websites.

Those messages echoed memos sent across all federal agencies: All diversity efforts would be shuttered and recipients should report efforts to disguise or obscure such programs. They warned of potential punishment if the attempts were not reported within 10 days.

They also ordered the removal of websites and documents from public view, as well as the elimination of groups and teams that were working on efforts like improving quality of life for women and minorities.

On Wednesday, the Army's acting civilian leader issued a memo that called for the service[12] to take down all "outward-facing media" that dealt with diversity and inclusion and cancel all related training immediately.

The next day, the Army removed its sexual harassment and assault prevention policy[13] from the website that houses service rules, meaning the policy was unavailable to be referenced by soldiers and commanders. The regulation governs how to properly document incidents and best practices for victim protection. The service's regulation on command policy[14], which outlines the expectations of commanders, was also taken down.

When Military.com inquired about the removal, several Army officials said that the policies were taken down as part of the Army's scrub of anything that might be "DEI related."

They were restored several hours after the inquiry was made.

Meanwhile, on Thursday, a Navy official told Military.com that, while the sea service was complying with the order, it didn't have much in the way of public-facing materials to remove owing to the last several congressional policy bills that clamped down on diversity programs[15] across the military.

Yet on Friday, a Navy memo was posted to social media[16] from Vice Adm. Nancy Lacore -- the head of the Navy Reserve -- announcing she was canceling six reserve force policies, including those on anti-harassment, fraternization, and safety and occupational health.

The other three included a diversity policy, an equal employment opportunity policy, and a military equal opportunity policy.

When asked about the document, which went out Thursday, the same Navy official confirmed that the memo was real but stressed that the referenced policies were being "updated to ensure compliance with all directives outlined in executive orders issued by the president."

The Navy official said the service was not ready to formally say whether any civilian employees were placed on leave as a result of Trump's orders. The Army did not comment in time for publication.

The effect of Trump's order on the Marine Corps also appears to be a series of downed websites that leave questions as to whether those programs are still in effect.

The moves by the service, including the removal of the Culture and Inclusion Branch webpage, seem to contradict assurances from the Marine Corps' top officer that the branch had no programs that would be scaled back by the new administration.

Military.com asked about the status of those who worked in that branch office on Friday. But the service directed the publication to a statement from the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which reiterated the effort to comply with the president's executive orders.

Web links to other Marine Corps initiatives, such as the Diversity AIMED program, which sought to recruit "historically underrepresented populations" into the reserves, also seemed to have disappeared on Thursday. The service did not say when asked whether that program had been canceled.

Between 2010 and 2020, diversity for enlisted Marines and officers surged, according to a Marine Corps Times article from 2022[17], which also cited service officials touting the Diversity AIMED program launched that year. As recently as October, the Marine Corps' recruiting command said that "diversity officer accessions accounted for 35% of all officer accessions" in 2024, though the command described that population as men and women who bring a "diversity of background, culture and skill," a spokesperson said at the time.

Gen. Eric Smith, the service's top military official, rebuffed the idea that the Marine Corps had any diversity, equity and inclusion programs, or DEI -- the term used by the Trump administration -- when asked by reporters at an event last week.

"As far as DEI, the Marine Corps has not had DEI programs," Smith said, citing examples of women who have taken jobs as artillery officers, pilots and astronauts and met the physical and academic standards set out by the service to do so.

"We don't do DEI in the Marine Corps; we never have. We're a meritocracy-based organization. We always have been," he said. "If you want to apply for a [military occupational specialty], strap on your pack, grab your rifle, and make a run at it."

When asked whether the commandant had anything to add to his previous statement or in relation to programs now being shut down by the Marine Corps, a spokesperson told Military.com he did not have any further comments.

The president's order had a more clear and immediate effect on the Air Force and Space Force.

Military.com reported Wednesday that Acting Air Force Secretary Gary Ashworth had issued a memo saying all of the Air Force and Space Force's Barrier Analysis Working Groups -- which fought for more progressive policies for women, LGBTQ+ and minority airmen and Guardians -- were being discontinued immediately[18].

Many of the social media pages for those groups began to disappear or be renamed shortly after that order was made. Some of the website pages for the Department of the Air Force's diversity efforts were no longer loading on Friday or could not be located online, including details about the Air Force Academy[19]'s Diversity and Inclusion minor or Air Combat Command's Organizational Culture Office.

Two memos were posted publicly to the Air Force and Space Force websites: the memo ending the diverse working groups[20] and another asking personnel to "remove all outward-facing media (websites, social media accounts, etc.) of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) offices" as well as "withdraw any final or pending documents, directives, orders, materials and equity plans" related to Trump's order.

That memo[21] also ordered the services to cancel any "DEIA-related training and terminate any DEIA-related contract." The scope of training and policies that may be caught in those orders was still unclear.

As the military worked to adhere with mixed results, the Department of Veterans Affairs was one of the more aggressive agencies in not only carrying out Trump's order but also being more transparent than most in communicating its effects.

Acting VA Secretary Todd Hunter issued a memo announcing the department would close all diversity offices and cancel diversity-related contracts.

"These programs divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination," Hunter wrote in the memo.

In addition to deleting websites, the agency also shuttered all offices focused on diversity initiatives and placed 60 employees whose jobs were solely created to support diversity activities on paid administrative leave, according to VA spokeswoman Morgan Ackley.

Related: Air Force Groups that Advocated for Beard Policies, Better Body Armor Are Gutted by Trump Directive[22]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[23].

Read more

Migrants board a removal flight at Fort Bliss, Texas

Military units from across the country are scrambling to get in place along the southern border following President Donald Trump's order earlier this week[1], and U.S. aircraft have already begun flying deported immigrants out of the country as the mission rapidly moves along.

After the Department of Defense announced Wednesday that 1,500 troops would be initially assigned to the border mission, what bases and units they were coming from and what other forces could be included remained questions.

By Friday, U.S. Northern Command -- which was tasked with overseeing the mission -- began to provide some details but noted in a statement that "the exact number of personnel will fluctuate as units rotate personnel and as additional forces are tasked to deploy once planning efforts are finalized."

Read Next: Problems with Tricare Contract Transition 'Actively Harming' Military, Lawmaker Tells Pentagon[2]

Since Trump issued his executive order to use even more active-duty troops to secure the border late Monday, the Pentagon -- largely led by placeholder officials -- has moved fast to comply with the presidential mandate, which set aggressive deadlines for military planners.

During that effort, officials have struggled to articulate many of the details that are normally a fundamental part of any military deployment[3], even as this one reportedly could ultimately swell to as many as 10,000 troops [4]and as service members were already beginning to head to the border.

"If you see in the executive order, the 30-day timeline for a Level 3 plan, that's an incredibly aggressive timeline," an official from U.S. Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, told Military.com on Friday. "Level 3" refers to plans that are one step below a fully formed operational document[5].

They noted that plans like that "usually take way longer to come together, so it's all hands on deck."

Multiple service and command officials spoke to Military.com on condition of anonymity to explain details of a rapidly evolving military situation.

On Wednesday afternoon, the Pentagon held its first briefing to offer details about the initial wave of 1,500 troops being mobilized to the southern border.

While reporters were told that the breakdown would be 1,000 soldiers from the Army[6] and 500 Marines, the senior defense official who spoke to reporters stressed that it was just "36 hours after the [executive order], so that's something to keep in mind." No details about what units would be tapped were offered.

That evening, a Marine Corps[7] official told Military.com that 500 Marines from 1st Marine Division out of Camp Pendleton[8], California, were prepared to respond to the border, with preparations in place to surge that number to up to 2,500 personnel if called upon to do so.

It would take until Friday for NORTHCOM to offer the same level of detail for the Army when, in a statement, the combatant command named 13 Army units from Texas, Kentucky, New York, Georgia, Kansas, Colorado and Washington state making up the 1,000 soldiers, as well as the battalions and units that comprise the 500 Marines being deployed.

Pentagon officials also told reporters Wednesday that all 500 Marines were being pulled from the Federal Emergency Management Agency mission to support California's wildfire response. But on Friday, the Marine Corps clarified to Military.com that, while a "majority" of the Marines being sent to the border had previously been tapped to respond to wildfires in California, "there are a few exceptions to that," including shifting certain capabilities and replacing Marines coming up on the end of their service contracts.

Amid this fluid situation was also an order from Acting Defense Secretary Robert Salesses to the services to pause all social media use though, in a statement Thursday, he did say that the "pause does not apply for content and imagery relative to the DoD's current border security operations."

Marines Move Out

While officials were hesitant to offer early details on which specific units were actually heading the border, images of the response effort were already being made available online.

Marines were photographed laying concertina wire[9] at the border as early as Thursday and, on Friday, the White House posted a video on social media[10] of Marine Corps MV-2B Ospreys[11] landing and offloading Marines at what appeared to be the border with Mexico as agents from the U.S. Border Patrol looked on.

Another Marine Corps official told Military.com that an initial element of about 50 Marines arrived early Thursday morning in San Diego, which is about 30 minutes north of California's southern border. They said that roughly 450 other Marines from the unit, specifically detachments from 1st Combat Engineer and 7th Combat Engineer battalions, were staged and ready to move from Camp Pendleton -- further north in the state -- once staging areas were set.

As of Friday afternoon, all 500 Marines who staged at Camp Pendleton were at the border, a Marine Corps official told Military.com.

Two Ospreys from the 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing out of Marine Corps Air Station Miramar[12], near San Diego, reconnoitered landing zones at California's southern border Thursday afternoon, another Marine Corps official told Military.com on Friday.

Marines with VMM-161 and MWSS-373, Osprey and aviation ground support squadrons, all belonging to 3rd MAW, met with Border Patrol agents on the ground before returning to MCAS Miramar as part of an effort to scout potential landing areas for delivering supplies and personnel if necessary for future operations, according to two Marine officials.

Army's Rapid Response Force

Multiple military officials also told Military.com that the 82nd Airborne's 3rd Brigade Combat Team -- one of the nation's most visible units and the military's rapid response force -- is also preparing to deploy to the southern border.

The use of the 82nd Airborne is significant since the unit is typically used to respond to major military crises that threaten U.S. troops, citizens or allies abroad. In recent years, it has been tapped to respond to escalating tensions with Iran[13], put on alert and deployed to Europe ahead of the Russian invasion of Ukraine[14], and took part in the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Officials also said that part of the 10th Mountain Division out of Fort Drum[15] in New York may serve as a headquarters element for the response at the border.

However, officials at the Pentagon were not ready to make the announcement Friday.

"At this time, there are no units from the 82nd Airborne Division or the 10th Mountain Division mobilizing to support the mission at the southern border," a defense official told Military.com, but they added that the Pentagon was "actively planning and assessing the situation."

The Washington Post reported Friday[16] that one plan under consideration was a dramatic and public road march of Stryker[17] armored combat vehicles to the border.

Air Force Repatriation Flights

Meanwhile, Air Force[18] C-17 Globemaster IIIs[19], one from the 60th Air Mobility Wing out of Fort Bliss[20], Texas, and another out of Tuscon, Arizona, according to photo captions, were flying immigrants out of the country as recently as Wednesday evening. The Department of Homeland Security provided officers for the flight.

U.S. Transportation Command is leading the Air Force's airlift efforts for the border mission.

"We can confirm that overnight two Air Force C-17s conducted repatriation flights from the U.S. to Guatemala," a defense official confirmed to Military.com.

Images of the deportation flights were posted by the Department of Defense on Wednesday. Additionally, images of UH-72 Lakota[21] helicopters preparing for and operating surveillance flights out of New Mexico were also broadcast.

"This is just the beginning of something more and something new," the NORTHCOM official told Military.com on Friday, adding that the combatant command was "in the middle of an aggressive 30-day planning effort that will be looking across domains and across components to provide the solution of securing the border."

"This is the sole focus of the NORTHCOM planners, and they're not only looking at the comfortable domain of land, we are looking at land, maritime, air, cyber -- everything."

-- Steve Beynon contributed to this report.

Related: Trump Orders 1,500 Active-Duty Troops to Border Ahead of Pentagon Security Plan Deadline[22]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[23].

Read more

Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's choice to be Defense Secretary

WASHINGTON — Sen. Lisa Murkowski announced Thursday that she will vote against confirming Pete Hegseth[1] to lead the Pentagon, becoming the first Republican to oppose one of President Donald Trump’s[2] Cabinet picks ahead of a crucial test vote.

Murkowski, of Alaska, said in a lengthy statement that allegations of excessive drinking and aggressive actions toward women[3], which Hegseth has denied, show that his behaviors “starkly contrast” with what is expected of the U.S. military. She also noted his past statements that women should not fill military combat roles.

“I remain concerned about the message that confirming Mr. Hegseth sends to women currently serving and those aspiring to join,” Murkowski wrote on social media.

Murkowski said behavior that Hegseth has acknowledged, “including infidelity on multiple occasions,” shows a lack of judgement. “These behaviors starkly contrast the values and discipline expected of service members,” she said.

"Above all, I believe that character is the defining trait required of the Secretary of Defense, and must be prioritized without compromise,” she said.

Senate GOP leaders rushed to advance Trump's[4] defense secretary nominee toward confirmation, despite grave objections from Democrats and stirring unease among Republicans over his behavior and qualifications to lead the U.S. military.

It will take a simple majority senators to advance Hegseth’s confirmation in Thursday’s vote. Most Republicans, who hold a 53-seat majority in the chamber, have signaled they will back the nominee, though Vice PResident JD Vance could be called in to break a tie vote.

Rarely has a Cabinet choice encountered such swirling allegations of wrongdoing. Trump is standing by Hegseth, and the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee has dismissed the claims as factually inaccurate.

“I am ironclad in my assessment that the nominee, Mr. Hegseth, is prepared to be the next secretary of defense,” the chairman, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said in a statement on the eve of the test vote. "The Senate needs to confirm this nominee as fast as possible.”

A new president's national security nominees are often the first to be lined up for confirmation, to unsure U.S. safety at home and abroad. Already the Senate has overwhelmingly confirmed Marco Rubio[5] as secretary of state in a unanimous vote, and it was on track to confirm John Ratcliffe[6] as CIA director later Thursday.

But Hegseth stands in a category of his own amid allegations[7] that he sexually assaulted a woman at a Republican conference in California, which he has denied as a consensual encounter, and of heavy drinking at events when he led a veterans organization. He has also said women should not work in combat roles, a view he has since tempered during his confirmation process.

A new claim emerged[8] this week in an affidavit from a former sister-in-law who claimed Hegseth was abusive to his second wife to the point that she feared for her safety. Hegseth has denied the allegation. In divorce proceedings, neither Hegseth nor the woman claimed to be a victim of domestic abuse.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said Thursday that Hegseth is unqualified for the job because of his personal behavior, including drinking, and his lack of experience.

“One of the kindest words that might be used to describe Mr. Hegseth is erratic, and that’s a term you don’t want at DOD,” Schumer said. “He has a clear problem of judgment.”

A Princeton and Harvard-educated former combat veteran, Hegseth went on to make a career at Fox News, where he hosted a weekend show. Trump tapped him as the defense secretary to lead an organization with nearly 2.1 million service members, about 780,000 civilians and a budget of $850 billion.

Hegseth has promised not to drink on the job if confirmed.

But senators have remained doubtful of his experience and abilities and the alleged behavior that could lead to reprimand or firing[9] for military personnel he would now be expected to lead.

Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, herself a combat veteran and sexual assault survivor, has signaled her backing.

However, several GOP senators, including Murkowski and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, are being widely watched for their votes.

During a fiery confirmation[10] hearing, Hegseth swatted away allegations of wrongdoing one by one — dismissing them as “smears” — as he displayed his military credentials and vowed to bring “warrior culture" to the top Pentagon post.

Wicker said he had been briefed a third time on the FBI background investigation into Hegseth. He said "the allegations unfairly impugning his character do not pass scrutiny.”

© Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more

Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump's choice to be Defense Secretary

WASHINGTON — The Senate advanced the nomination of Pete Hegseth as President Donald Trump's defense secretary Thursday on a largely party-line vote, despite grave objections from Democrats and stirring unease among Republicans over his behavior and qualifications to lead the U.S. military.

Two Republicans, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, broke ranks with Trump and his allies who have mounted an extensive public campaign to push Hegseth toward confirmation. The former combat veteran and Fox News host faces allegations of excessive drinking and aggressive actions toward women, which he has denied. The vote was 51-49, with a final vote on confirmation expected Friday.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer implored his colleagues to think seriously, "Is this the best man we have to lead the greatest military in the world?"

Murkowksi, in a lengthy statement, said that his behaviors "starkly contrast" with what is expected of the military. She also noted his past statements that women should not fill military combat roles. Hegseth sought to temper those statements during the confirmation process.

"I remain concerned about the message that confirming Mr. Hegseth sends to women currently serving and those aspiring to join," Murkowski wrote on social media.

Murkowski said behavior that Hegseth has acknowledged, "including infidelity on multiple occasions," shows a lack of judgment. "These behaviors starkly contrast the values and discipline expected of service members," she said.

Collins said that while she appreciates Hegseth's "courageous military service and his ongoing commitment to our service members and their families, I am concerned that he does not have the experience and perspective necessary to succeed in the job."

She also said that after a lengthy discussion with Hegseth, "I am not convinced that his position on women serving in combat roles has changed."

Rarely has a Cabinet choice encountered such swirling allegations of wrongdoing. Trump is standing by Hegseth, and the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee has dismissed the claims as factually inaccurate.

It will take a simple majority of senators to confirm Hegseth's nomination. Most Republicans, who hold a 53-seat majority in the chamber, have signaled they will back the nominee, though Vice President JD Vance could be called in to break a tie vote.

"I am ironclad in my assessment that the nominee, Mr. Hegseth, is prepared to be the next secretary of defense," the chairman, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said in a statement on the eve of voting. "The Senate needs to confirm this nominee as fast as possible."

A new president's national security nominees are often the first to be lined up for confirmation, to ensure U.S. safety at home and abroad. Already the Senate has overwhelmingly confirmed Marco Rubio as secretary of state in a unanimous vote, and confirmed John Ratcliffe as CIA director Thursday.

But Hegseth stands in a category of his own amid allegations that he sexually assaulted a woman at a Republican conference in California, which he has denied as a consensual encounter, and of heavy drinking at events when he led a veterans organization.

A new claim emerged this week in an affidavit from a former sister-in-law who claimed Hegseth was abusive to his second wife to the point that she feared for her safety. Hegseth has denied the allegation. In divorce proceedings, neither Hegseth nor the woman claimed to be a victim of domestic abuse.

Schumer said Thursday that Hegseth is unqualified for the job.

"One of the kindest words that might be used to describe Mr. Hegseth is erratic, and that's a term you don't want at DOD," Schumer said. "He has a clear problem of judgment."

A Princeton and Harvard-educated former combat veteran, Hegseth went on to make a career at Fox News, where he hosted a weekend show. Trump tapped him as the defense secretary to lead an organization with nearly 2.1 million service members, about 780,000 civilians and a budget of $850 billion.

During a fiery confirmation hearing, Hegseth swatted away allegations of wrongdoing one by one — dismissing them as "smears" — as he displayed his military credentials and vowed to bring "warrior culture" to the top Pentagon post.

Hegseth has promised not to drink on the job if confirmed.

Wicker said he had been briefed a third time on the FBI background investigation into Hegseth. He said "the allegations unfairly impugning his character do not pass scrutiny."

But senators have remained doubtful of his experience and abilities and the alleged behavior that could lead to reprimand or firing for military personnel he would now be expected to lead.

Still, Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, herself a combat veteran and sexual assault survivor, has signaled her backing.

© Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more

More Articles …