2023 BEYA Stars and Stripes Awards Ceremony

The Army[1] and other service branches are abandoning recruiting[2] efforts at a prestigious Black engineering event this week, turning down access to a key pool of highly qualified potential applicants amid President Donald Trump's purge of diversity initiatives in the military.

Until this week, Army Recruiting Command had a long-standing public partnership with the Black Engineer of the Year Awards, or BEYA, an annual conference that draws students, academics and professionals in science, technology, engineering and math, also known as STEM.

The event, which takes place in Baltimore, has historically been a key venue for the Pentagon to recruit talent, including awarding Reserve Officers' Training Corps scholarships and pitching military service to rising engineers. Past BEYA events have included the Army chief of staff and the defense secretary.

Read Next: Army, Navy Restore Webpages Highlighting Women's Service as Other Military Diversity Efforts Are Erased[3]

"This is one of the most talent-dense events we do," one Army recruiter told Military.com on the condition that their name not be used. "Our footprint there has always been significant. We need the talent."

The services cited concerns that participation in the predominantly Black event could run afoul of Trump's orders and the Pentagon's intensifying push to erase diversity efforts in the military, according to multiple sources familiar with the decision. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Jan. 31 ordered that Black History Month, Women's History Month and others were officially "dead" and that the military would no longer mark them.

"In compliance with Department of Defense and Headquarters Department of the Army guidance, U.S. Army Recruiting Command will not participate in the upcoming BEYA event," Madison Bonzo, a service spokesperson, said in a statement to Military.com. "Service members and civilians are permitted to attend this event in an unofficial/personal capacity if they choose to do so."

Officials for BEYA did not return a request for comment.

The Navy, Air Force[4] and Space Force[5] are also pulling out of the event and forbidding officials from attending in an official capacity or in uniform. It was unclear Monday whether the Marines were still participating.

Additional recruiting events tied to specific racial or gender groups are also likely to be scrapped, two defense officials told Military.com. That includes other conferences and career fairs with thousands of participants.

The decision to abandon the Black engineering event marks a significant shift in military recruiting strategy -- and sparked calls of discrimination.

"It's f---ing racist," one active-duty Army general told Military.com on the condition of anonymity to avoid retaliation. "For the Army now, it's 'Blacks need not apply' and it breaks my heart."

While the services are pulling out of BEYA, a well-established pipeline for high-caliber STEM talent, they remain engaged with other events. Last week, the same Army recruiting unit that would have attended BEYA instead participated in a National Rifle Association-sponsored event in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, a predominantly white gathering that recruiters acknowledge is less likely to yield high-quality applicants.

The BEYA conference has long been intertwined with the Pentagon and the defense industry amid an ongoing competition with Silicon Valley for top-shelf talent as military jobs become increasingly technical. It regularly features panels with senior military leaders and hosts various recruiting initiatives. Top sponsors include Lockheed Martin and Google.

"The U.S. military is one of the largest STEM employers in the nation, yet its critical role in driving technological innovation often goes overlooked and misunderstood by the civilian sector," a note on BEYA's website says. "BEYA works to bridge this gap by highlighting the vast STEM opportunities available within the armed forces[6] and showcasing military leadership in science, technology, engineering and mathematics."

Beyond being a recruiting event, the services also had a significant relationship with BEYA that included its own awards ceremonies. In 2023, Gen. Randy George, the top officer in the Army, awarded now-retired Maj. Gen. Robert Edmonson II the Stars and Stripes General Officer of the Year Award, a prestigious accolade for achievements in national security.

"It's our mission to keep the United States safe from a range of 21st-century threats," former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said in a keynote address at the BEYA ceremony in 2023. "We're determined to continue innovating to make America more secure; that means drawing on the strengths of all people."

Army officials interviewed by Military.com, which included five recruiters, saw the move as a significant and problematic escalation in the Pentagon's rejection of diversity initiatives, which have been widely interpreted as programs that recognize women and troops with minority backgrounds, as well as gay and lesbian troops. Trump has initiated a separate effort to eliminate transgender troops from the ranks.

Hegseth, who was confirmed last month, has made rooting out diversity his top priority at the Pentagon, with the services scrambling to scrub programs, policies and even words from documents and websites. Trump, Hegseth and supporters claim that so-called "diversity, equity and inclusion," or DEI, programs have made the military weak.

Hegseth has falsely suggested the military has race- and gender-based quotas in promotions and assignments. No such policies exist, though there are loose aspirational goals[7] in some efforts to have segments of the military ranks better resemble the general population.

Much of Hegseth's diversity rollback had centered on bureaucratic changes, such as replacing references to "gender" with "sex" in policy language and scrapping the heritage month observances, including Black History Month.

But some officials now see the move away from recruiting events as a deliberate step to reduce outreach to Black applicants.

The move also comes after the Army Band canceled a concert at George Mason University in Virginia, where it was set to play music by Janelle Monáe, a Black singer and rapper.

The Army's partnership with the Black engineering awards has historically been about talent, not race, recruiters argue. The military's growing emphasis on STEM has made events like BEYA even more critical to recruiting, particularly as services compete for skilled candidates in a shrinking pool of qualified applicants.

"The military has been selecting on merit the whole time," said Katherine Kuzminski, an expert on the military and veterans at the Center for a New American Security think tank in Washington, D.C. "Some people might be seeing how the civilian world has handled DEI issues and applying that view to the military, but it has frameworks in law and policy, all these interloping standards that are rigorous and always have been rigorous."

The number of Black recruits in the Army -- the largest military service by far -- has risen over the years. In 2022, Black applicants made up 24% of the Army's new enlistments, according to internal data reviewed by Military.com, while Black Americans are just 14% of the general population.

Much of the Pentagon's recruiting woes have been tied to a shrinking pool of low-quality applicants, who increasingly struggle to meet academic standards on the military's SAT-style entrance exam.

The Navy and Army, the largest services with the highest recruiting quotas, have started pre-basic training prep courses that tutor applicants to perform well enough on the test to qualify for a job and move onto basic training. Those prep courses have effectively ended the recruiting slump that has plagued the Pentagon since the COVID-19 pandemic.

Related: West Point Eliminates Student Clubs Related to Gender or Race After Trump Order[8]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[9].

Read more

The Department of Defense logo is seen on the wall in the Press Briefing room at the Pentagon

NEW YORK (AP) — The Trump administration on Friday doubled the number of news organizations it is evicting from their workspaces at the Pentagon in order to rotate in more friendly outlets.

CNN, The Washington Post, the Hill and War Zone will be asked to leave their spaces, with Newsmax, the Washington Examiner, the Daily Caller and the Free Press moving in, according to a memo from John Ullyot, acting assistant to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

The decision, which the Pentagon Press Association called “unreasonable,” continues a pattern of hostility toward journalists by the administration, which this week said it was looking to cancel media subscriptions[1] paid for by agencies of the federal government.

“By turning over the office space loaned to you by the secretary, you will ensure that other outlets will enjoy the same opportunity to cover our nation's finest up close from office spaces inside the walls of the Pentagon this year and each year going forward,” Ullyot wrote.

It's common for news outlets to occupy space in places like the White House and state Capitols for quicker access to officials they need to do their jobs, and get stories out quickly. The Pentagon isn't preventing the ousted outlets from covering them, just making it more difficult for them to do their jobs.

CNN, in a statement, said that its “mission to report on the Department of Defense, U.S. military and Trump administration will continue regardless of office arrangements. We will not be deflected from our duty to hold all three fairly and fully to account.”

Similarly, The Washington Post said it would continue to cover the Pentagon independently and fairly, regardless of desk space.

The Pentagon announced its new rotation policy a week ago, saying that NBC News, the New York Times, NPR and Politico would be required to vacate. Their spaces are to be taken by One America News Network, the New York Post, Breitbart News and Huffpost.

The Times, Washington Post, CNN and Politico are each organizations that President Donald Trump has been critical of. Each of the outlets rotated in this week have been more supportive in their coverage.

None of the outlets offered prime real estate by the administration has requested more space from the Pentagon Press Association, which generally works to get room for reporters. Some are already in the Pentagon, the association said.

The association said in a statement Friday that it was “shocked and deeply disappointed” by the decision.

“Instead of reconsidering its approach after good faith outreach this week from more than 20 news organizations, the Defense Department appears to be doubling down on an unreasonable policy toward news outlets that have covered the U.S. military for decades,” the association said.

The association said it does not believe there are space constraints at the Pentagon, and its offer to find room for everyone “was discarded.”

Many news outlets with Pentagon workspaces have invested heavily in them, to get reliable Internet access or, in the case of television networks, wiring that enables them to instantly deliver live reports during urgent news stories.

Ullyot rejected press arguments, saying most outlets covering the Pentagon have no office space, and some television outlets have no trouble carrying in their equipment each day.

___

David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder[2] and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social[3]

© Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Read more

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is looking to live in military family housing and requested to use $137,000 in taxpayer funding for repairs -- including nearly $50,000 for an "emergency" paint job -- a pair of top Democratic lawmakers said in a letter Friday demanding more details.

While it is not unprecedented for a defense secretary to live in military housing, it is far more common for them to find private housing. And the reported price tag to fix up Hegseth's military house comes as rank-and-file service members continue to struggle with crumbling, unsafe living conditions and as the Trump administration has been looking to slash government spending elsewhere[1].

"We know that many service members and their families currently live in unacceptable housing conditions including houses with mold, lead paint, and other hazards," Democratic Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida and Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut said in their letter to Hegseth about his housing. "What commitment will you make to provide service members with a similarly high quality of housing for themselves and their families?"

Read Next: Air Force Has Troops Remove Names, Unit Patches from Uniforms During Deportation Flights[2]

DeLauro is the ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee, and Wasserman Schultz is the ranking member of the panel's subcommittee in charge of military construction funding.

Under the law, Congress must be notified if maintenance and repairs for housing meant for general and flag officers is going to cost more than $35,000.

In that context, lawmakers were notified late last month that the Army[3] was looking to spend $137,297 on maintenance on an unoccupied family housing unit, according to Wasserman Schultz and DeLauro's letter. The total cost included $49,900 for an "emergency" paint job, the letter added.

On Wednesday, almost a week after the initial notification, the lawmakers found out Hegseth will be moving into the house that's being repaired, the letter said.

The Pentagon did not respond to Military.com's requests for comment Friday on the claims in the letter.

The apparent urgency to fix up Hegseth's housing comes as service members have struggled for years with subpar housing and an inability to get timely repairs.

A series of 2018 Reuters articles[4] exposed systemic issues with privatized military housing for families such as mold, rodent infestations and shoddy repairs, and military families have continued to report similar issues[5] in the years since.

Young enlisted troops in the barracks, too, have faced unsafe living conditions. A 2023 Government Accountability Office report found rampant problems[6] with overflowing sewage, mold, bed bug infestations and squatters.

At least one defense secretary has lived in military housing before. Bob Gates lived in a home on a Navy[7] compound in Washington, D.C., when he was defense secretary, Stars and Stripes reported in 2008[8]. Gates was the first defense secretary to live in military housing, according to the news outlet.

Most defense secretaries find their own homes. For example, Hegseth's immediate predecessor, Lloyd Austin, lived in a nearly $3 million, 8,700-square-foot house in Great Falls, Virginia, according to Task and Purpose[9].

When Gates lived in military housing, he paid more than $6,500 in monthly rent. At the time, defense officials expressed concern that he was required to pay more than three times as much as an officer would to live in the same house, because officers only had to pay the amount of their basic allowance for housing[10], according to Stars and Stripes.

The Pentagon did not answer Military.com's question about whether Hegseth will pay rent and how much.

In response to the concerns in 2008, Congress passed a law in that year's annual defense policy bill saying rent for a defense secretary living in military housing must be 105% of the monthly BAH[11] rate for a four-star general living with dependents in the same area.

"The Department of Defense requested this provision in the belief that housing the secretary of defense in established quarters on a secure military installation is far more cost-effective than installing, maintaining and protecting sensitive Department of Defense equipment, along with secure information facilities and security and detection systems, in private residences," a Senate report about that year's bill said.

The report also said DoD believed that it would reduce disruptions to the public and costs for security protection.

Under the law, the rent is supposed to cover "maintenance, protection, alteration, repair, improvement or restoration."

In their letter to Hegseth[12], Wasserman Schultz and DeLauro also asked about what rent he will pay and whether any other defense secretaries lived in military housing that needed funding to be repaired first.

The pair also asked why exactly there needs to be an emergency paint job, as well as for a list of available officers' housing that doesn't require as costly maintenance as the house Hegseth is choosing.

They requested a response by Feb. 21.

The first Trump administration had several scandals involving Cabinet officials and their housing or furnishings.

Scott Pruitt, who served as the head of the Environmental Protection Agency at the beginning of the first Trump administration, was forced to resign amid several scandals, including allegations that he got a sweetheart deal to rent a D.C. condo[13] from an energy lobbyist.

Mike Pompeo reportedly lived in Army housing when he was secretary of state. According to Politico, he first tried to live[14] in Navy housing, but lawyers for that service called the idea "problematic" and raised "factual, legal, fiscal and ethical" concerns.

And Ben Carson, who served as housing and urban development secretary, faced allegations that he misused funds for fancy office furniture, though he was cleared of wrongdoing[15].

Related: These Soldiers Say Mold in Barracks Isn't Just Disgusting, It's Making Them Sick[16]

© Copyright 2025 Military.com. All rights reserved. This article may not be republished, rebroadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without written permission. To reprint or license this article or any content from Military.com, please submit your request here[17].

Read more

More Articles …