The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has collapsed, abruptly ending its operations as a new U.S. led military coordination body prepares to oversee and coordinate aid distribution in the territory.
The U.S.- and Israel-backed relief effort that began operating in late May shut down permanently this week in Gaza, deepening an already severe access gap for civilians as the U.S.-led Civil Military Coordination Center (CMCC) moves to coordinate aid delivery, security and movement across the war-torn strip.
On Nov. 24 the group announced it was ending its Gaza operations, calling its emergency mission complete. In the days that followed, governments, aid groups and analysts treated the move as a permanent shutdown or in effect a full collapse of the program.
Trucks carrying commercial goods drive through Gaza City after entering from Israel via the Zikim crossing, northern Gaza Strip, Thursday, Nov. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)
“It has no impact on our operations because we never worked with them,” a United Nations spokesperson told Military.com, underscoring that the organization operated outside the U.N. led humanitarian system.
The collapse comes as Gaza faces ongoing shortages of food, water and medical supplies and as families displaced by months of fighting remain without stable shelter.
A Controversial Model Unravels
The foundation was launched as an alternative to traditional humanitarian channels and used privately operated secured distribution hubs. Supporters said that approach could limit aid diversion and accelerate delivery. Critics said it posed safety risks for civilians, threatened impartiality, and lacked transparency.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks with US military personnel as he visits the Civil-Military Coordination Center in southern Israel, Friday, Oct. 24, 2025. (Fadel Senna/Pool Photo via AP)
Residents and monitoring organizations described crowded, confusing conditions at distribution points, limited access for vulnerable populations and security incidents along approach routes. Experts questioned whether a model secured by private contractors could meet internationally accepted standards for neutrality and impartiality.
Despite those concerns, the foundation maintained that its model delivered food and supplies to civilians in desperate need.
CMCC Steps into New Role
The Civil Military Coordination Center tied to ceasefire implementation and backed by the United States is now expected to oversee and coordinate aid related logistics for Gaza. Key operational details remain undisclosed.
Premature babies lie in incubators at the neonatal intensive care unit of Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)
Questions remain about how access will be managed, who will control security, and whether independent humanitarian groups will be allowed to operate without military or political constraints. Aid specialists warn that perception alone of aid delivery under a military-linked structure may deter civilians from seeking help.
Military.com reached out to the U.S. State Department, the Defense Department, Israeli authorities, Palestinian officials and multiple international humanitarian organizations for comment. Some did not respond before publication while others declined to comment.
Humanitarian Conditions Remain Critical
Hospitals in Gaza remain overwhelmed. Access to clean water remains inconsistent. Malnutrition and shortages of medical supplies continue to be reported among vulnerable populations. Aid observers say any disruption in aid delivery could worsen already dire conditions for children, the elderly and the chronically ill.
A makeshift tent stands amid widespread devastation in Gaza City Thursday, Nov. 27, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)
In other regions of conflict, limited scope missions[1] that began with narrow goals have expanded into long-term, open-ended operations, increasing instability and complicating humanitarian access.
In Gaza, more than 1,000 civilians have reportedly been killed[2] since May while attempting to reach food assistance, highlighting the extreme danger faced by those seeking aid when distribution systems break down or become disorganized.
The shutdown is more than the end of one aid group and may redefine how humanitarian aid is managed in future conflict zones. A shift toward militarized coordination, private contractors and ad hoc systems continues to raise concerns among international aid communities about impartiality, transparency and long-term access.
