The legendary Alexander Fleming, who famously discovered penicillin, once said 'never to neglect an extraordinary appearance or happening.' And the path of science often leads to just that. New research is turning the page in our understanding of harmful bacteria and how they turn on certain genes, causing disease in our bodies.
Read more …Scientists discover the possible triggers for bacterial pathogens, opening the door for new...
Beyond the sheer immediate devastation of the current conflict – in which around 1,400 Israels and more than 2,800 Palestinians[3]were killed[4] in the first 10 days of fighting – there will be significant and undoubtedly long-lasting implications for the Gaza Strip’s health system.
The immediate concern in Gaza is for those seeking assistance due to the bombing campaign that Israel ordered after an attack on its people by Hamas fighters. An expected ground offensive[8] will only further risk more civilian casualties.
And things may soon get worse. According to the United Nations’ Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Gaza’s hospitals have been forced to work without electricity[14], using fuel to run generators to ensure life-saving equipment remains functioning. The U.N. estimates this fuel will run out any day due to a complete siege placed on Gaza by Israel.
Such conditions have led to concerns that alongside the massive number of bombing victims, Gaza health services will soon have to contend with the outbreak of disease[15]. Patients with immediate health needs, like dialysis or chemotherapy, are among those being ordered to leave and head for greater safety in Gaza’s south, although evacuation routes have also been bombed[16].
A century of underfunding
The current devastation to Gaza’s health system is obvious. But Gaza’s health care system was already under stress before the latest bombardment. In fact, policies that stretch back decades have left it unable to meet even the basic health needs of Gaza’s residents, let alone respond to the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe.
What each have had in common is that, from my perspective as a global health expert, they invested little in Palestinian health. For periods of the 20th century, the health priorities of successive governing bodies appeared focused more on reducing the spread of communicable disease[22] to protect foreigners interacting with the native Palestinian population.
There was seemingly far less attention paid to building health infrastructure, adequately training health personnel, promoting preventive care and other long-term initiatives that make up a sustainable health system.
Under Israeli occupation from 1967, several Palestinian hospitals were turned into detention centers or military offices[23], while others were closed, and new ones were prohibited from opening. Palestinian physicians working in the occupied territories earned one-third the salary of their Israeli counterparts.
As a result of this neglect, health indicators throughout what are now called the occupied territories – the West Bank and Gaza Strip – have been poor.
Maternal and infant mortality – typical indicators of health system functioning – tends to be high. For example, in the mid-1980s[24], infant mortality was over 30 per 1,000 live births for Palestinians, compared with just under 10 per 1,000 among the Jewish population of Israel. And infant mortality has remained stubbornly high in Gaza[25].
Meanwhile, a lack of a reliable drinkable water infrastructure and overall unsanitary conditions resulted in the spread of parasitic and other infectious diseases, like rotavirus, cholera and salmonella – which remain leading causes of death[26] in Gaza’s children.
Since then, chronic underfunding of public hospitals has meant that Palestinians in Gaza have remained reliant on outside money and nongovernmental organizations for essential health services. This started a trend of humanitarian dependence[29] that continues to this day, with many of Gaza’s health facilities funded by the United Nations, humanitarian agencies like Doctors Without Borders[30] and religious organizations.
During the passage of the Oslo Accords[31] in the mid-1990s, the Palestinian Authority was established to administer services in the occupied territories. The accords called for health responsibilities to be transferred to the newly formed Palestinian Ministry of Health as preparation for a sovereign Palestinian state, which the accords called for within a five-year period.
But as it became increasingly clear that the overarching goal of the Oslo Accords for Palestinians – statehood – would not materialize[35], disillusion with the Palestinian Authority led to victory for Hamas in 2006 elections held in Gaza. Since then, Hamas has been considered the de facto governing body in Gaza, while the Palestinian Authority operates in the West Bank.
The rise of Hamas, which the U.S., Israel and others[36] designate as a terrorist group, saw Gaza become isolated from the international community. It also coincided with Israel imposing a full land, sea and air blockade of Gaza.
Gazans who need advanced care, whether for cancer or other chronic illnesses, traumatic injuries and other life-threatening ailments, often can only access needed services[39] in Israeli hospitals and require a permit to cross the border from Gaza. Some die before the permit process is complete[40].
Gaza health services after the siege
This vulnerable health system is now facing unprecedented challenges, staffed by health professionals who have committed to stay with their patients[41] even under hospital evacuation orders and at risk of death.
It is uncertain what the health system of Gaza will look like in the future.
In years past, international aid would help repair[42] and rebuild some, but not all, of the infrastructure damaged in airstrikes, especially schools and hospitals.
But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has promised a “long and difficult war[43].” And with the level of destruction seen in just a few days, it remains unclear just what will be left in the aftermath.
Replacing this human capital and vital infrastructure could take years, if not generations – and that is without the limits of a punishing blockade and continued bombardment.